Ariel, Melissa and their cohorts have the CG Gazette, Miami Herald, and Political Cortadito promoting their stories. At least we have Aesop's Gables to inform what is really going on. Also, it is interesting that Aesop's critics do not challenge any of the statements written by Aesop. They go for character criticism. Yes, when the facts are inconvenient, the only thing that Aesop's critics can do is to smear the name.
You know who doesn’t use AI to write? Aesop. This latest piece is another chef’s-kiss of storytelling. So good you’d enjoy it even if you had no clue who the characters were.
But for those of us in Coral Gables who do know? Let’s just say most of us are well aware that the Gazette and Gables Insider are about as “neutral” on Lago as the Miami Herald is on Republicans. The jig’s up, folks you’re not fooling anyone. You. Are. Not. Credible.
Frankly, I wouldn’t even line a parrot’s cage with your papers, and I love parrots.
The Gazette’s latest mea culpa is less a defense and more a blueprint for future mischief: admit the tiniest infractions, wave away the damning tech evidence, and double down on your “independent journalist” branding. If the past few months are any guide, we can expect increasingly subtle campaigns of paltering—articles that dance around real conflicts of interest while promoting friendly political actors under the guise of civic reporting.
The next move is almost predictable: more AI-assisted content to generate volume, selective praise for allies, and opaque disclaimers designed to make the casual reader assume objectivity where none exists. Coral Gables’ “independent local news” may soon resemble a legalistic chess game: the Gazette moves the pieces, we just marvel at how they manage to checkmate facts without ever touching the truth.
All of this is rich coming from someone who chooses to be anonymous. What is your donation history? What is your connection to Lago, his PAC, and his paid consultants?
The hypocrisy on your side is astonishing. Imagine calling someone out for being anonymous while using a fake name. Can you even answer your own questions? It must really suck to dick pull a team of fucking losers.
“Can you even answer your own questions?” Yes, I can. I have never donated to a candidate for election in Coral Gables. I voted for Lago in the last election but otherwise have no connection to him or his political operatives. Now, your turn, Justin and Aesop!
Ariel, Melissa and their cohorts have the CG Gazette, Miami Herald, and Political Cortadito promoting their stories. At least we have Aesop's Gables to inform what is really going on. Also, it is interesting that Aesop's critics do not challenge any of the statements written by Aesop. They go for character criticism. Yes, when the facts are inconvenient, the only thing that Aesop's critics can do is to smear the name.
Once again thank you Aesop for keeping the truth alive...Gazette is KFC in disguise.
Keep up the good work. God bless you.
You know who doesn’t use AI to write? Aesop. This latest piece is another chef’s-kiss of storytelling. So good you’d enjoy it even if you had no clue who the characters were.
But for those of us in Coral Gables who do know? Let’s just say most of us are well aware that the Gazette and Gables Insider are about as “neutral” on Lago as the Miami Herald is on Republicans. The jig’s up, folks you’re not fooling anyone. You. Are. Not. Credible.
Frankly, I wouldn’t even line a parrot’s cage with your papers, and I love parrots.
The Gazette’s latest mea culpa is less a defense and more a blueprint for future mischief: admit the tiniest infractions, wave away the damning tech evidence, and double down on your “independent journalist” branding. If the past few months are any guide, we can expect increasingly subtle campaigns of paltering—articles that dance around real conflicts of interest while promoting friendly political actors under the guise of civic reporting.
The next move is almost predictable: more AI-assisted content to generate volume, selective praise for allies, and opaque disclaimers designed to make the casual reader assume objectivity where none exists. Coral Gables’ “independent local news” may soon resemble a legalistic chess game: the Gazette moves the pieces, we just marvel at how they manage to checkmate facts without ever touching the truth.
All of this is rich coming from someone who chooses to be anonymous. What is your donation history? What is your connection to Lago, his PAC, and his paid consultants?
Interesting critique, considering Mr and Mrs. Dogood named you Silence.
The hypocrisy on your side is astonishing. Imagine calling someone out for being anonymous while using a fake name. Can you even answer your own questions? It must really suck to dick pull a team of fucking losers.
“Can you even answer your own questions?” Yes, I can. I have never donated to a candidate for election in Coral Gables. I voted for Lago in the last election but otherwise have no connection to him or his political operatives. Now, your turn, Justin and Aesop!